Best practice for spacing tests within a course composed of multiple videos

@Daniel - hi - yes pros and cons to each approach and some of this really depends on the complexity of your materials, your targeted audience, and parameters that your SMEs may desire as part of the experience. 
Getting beyond that generalization - I think it comes down to what you really want to achieve with your audience:

1. short videos with tests immediately after will increase a majority of your learners chances to retain their knowledge and pass the test. This knowledge check approach aligns with many today as a desired approach because it can be a great way of exercising the learner through the materials while it is still in context. Many times today you can also enforce a gated experience - a person must pass the test before moving on (a gated experience)…and that will also work very well because you are now forcing short term memory to be exercised to be successful.
2. medium length test after a few short videos will decrease their chances of knowledge retaining without giving a fair warning that this will be happening if it is all done in one sitting. If your learners have  some “skin” in the material (they have a strong reason to be consuming, are incentivized, and have an interest and it is in context for them) the difference between 1&2 are not that great depending on your targeted audience.
3. the more traditional route? Most learners are used to this. Keep your questions simpler or you will receive feedback about its complexity.

Can you push your team outside the box though? With the advent of HTML5 now predominantly well supported? There are tools that help to embed questions directly in your videos. Those tools can loop a person to the material as necessary and even have hard stops when it is important to have a hard stop. Make it engaging like that and you may be considered a learning hero.

Great name btw.

-Dan

Many thanks @dklinger and @jason.moore for your thoughtful responses. To add some more context to my question, I’ve outlined our usage case in a bit more detail below. Any additional thoughts/advice would be greatly appreciated!

Usage case

Our courses teach learners how to operate and maintain industrial robots, so for each robot type we have an operation course and a maintenance course. Each of these courses is divided into folders that can contain anything from 3 to 25 videos. I would say that in general most of the important knowledge is evenly distributed and our content creators normally create one short knowledge check per video with each knowledge check consisting of about 3 questions on average. As such, it probably makes sense to have a short knowledge check after each video. That being said, one disadvantage of this approach is that the course can look quite long and potentially more intimidating with a test after each video. Some of our team members think the courses will look better and more streamlined with one long knowledge check at the end of each section or with several intermediate knowledge checks in-between. They also think that the learner may tire of having to complete a knowledge check after each video. Personally, I think I would prefer completing one short knowledge check after each video while my memory is still fresh, but I also understand that people learn differently. It would be really helpful to hear how other admins would approach our case. For example, do you think our learners will tire of having to complete a short knowledge check after each video, and do you think our courses will look less appealing? I know there isn’t only one “correct” answer to my questions, but it would great to hear your views.

Personally - I like to use short, 1 or 2 question quizzes after a video - or any content - really.

This approach seems to do a nice job of “encouraging” the learner to actually watch and pay attention to the videos or to actually read, listen, or interact with something as designed.

We have a lot of learners who are registered to take a course as a new hire by their employer. It was pretty easy to tell which students take it seriously and those who treat the training like the EULA (click, click, click, click).

Having more and smaller quiz questions throughout helped to minimize the EULA students.

@Daniel - A couple additional comments to your post.

...one disadvantage of this approach is that the course can look quite long and potentially more intimidating…

Of course… the flip side to that is for those paying customers - it can also make it look like they are getting their money worth - ha ha.

Seriously, though, I have always been a fan of more and smaller. This stems from my experience as a classroom teacher and gymnastics coach. Part of my design goal is to craft the learning in a way that can help the student feel as though they are making progress. This is done by making lots of small activities that move them towards the goal.

A 60-minute video, for example, may seem daunting or might be ignored until the learner has an hour to give in one sitting - leaving the progress bar at 0% for a long time. Even though a dozen 5-min videos is still an hour and the list of items on your “syllabus” is really long, the learner can chip away at those smaller videos more easily and feel as though they are making progress. This can motivate them to return knowing they will move the meter forward.

One of my favorite sayings is that “Inch by inch its a cinch, mile by mile it takes a while.”

...the learner may tire of having to complete a knowledge check after each video.

The other part of me is a bit more draconian…

“...but do you want a job?”

These two sides of me struggle at times with one another.

Hello @Daniel Great thought on adding additional meaningful tags to the videos that the AI didn’t catch, or that may be specific to your organization’s terminology/language.  You may also consider making a number of Channels with How To tutorial videos in them, say - per robot family, or repair task-based, or tech role-based - that would make browsing for video content an option, in addition to searching with the above mentioned tags.

Great question! Did you know most training & development peeps haven’t had training in learning evaluation? Call them quizzes, tests, KCs, whatever. Trained IDs should know the principles of the purpose and methods of effective evaluation but non-IDs can too!

I caution focusing on what learners “like” or to pick methods that are easy for them to get through like KCs after each or longer ones after so much material, etc. Learning evaluation is a whole training topic in of itself, but try my fab 5 for eval. success!

1. The goal of evaluation is determining whether learning has taken place.
   1. So, what’s the purpose of the content (explainer videos, whatever)? If it’s for learning (learners can perform things from memory), evaluate!
   2. If the content is more performance support (think job aid) than learning, that’s not training, right? So go easy… Performance support is basically to help people perform in the moment of need. Dual purpose? I’d evaluate.
2.  Be sure your evaluation (questions, performance whatever) aligns with objectives/content.
   1. Common no-no’s: didn’t assess all objectives (how important was that objective then?), asking questions not in the content, wondering whether you have too many or too few questions.
   2. Some designers create evaluation as soon as objectives are done (wish I did this more) to help you stay aligned. Try an assessment/objectives matrix!
3. Evaluation, whenever it’s done, is complete if you determine whether objectives were met. Ok fine, you prolly better have at least one question aligned with an objective.
4. Aim for the highest performance expectation of the objective - don’t low ball with low-challenge recall of facts, right? People may be all happy everyone got 100% but what can they really do now?
5. Evaluation doesn’t need to always be that typical post-test with X multiple choice Qs all at the end. To your initial question, kinda lol… Mix it up, basic KCs along the way, great. if applicable, a final exercise where they complete something end-to-end related to the learning goals, yes! It doesn’t need to be an over-produced eval, whatever enables them to demonstrate what good looks like. If the content is self-paced, so can the evaluation.